vs
Workbird vs Make (formerly Integromat)
Compare Workbird and Make (formerly Integromat): Features, pricing, and capabilities to help you choose the best automation platform for your business.
Workbird
The first platform where workflows, AI agents, and MCP servers work as one intelligent system.
Make (formerly Integromat)
Make offers visual automation with more complexity than Zapier, but still lacks native AI agents and intelligent workflow orchestration.
Feature Comparison
See how Workbird and Make (formerly Integromat) compare across key automation features
| Feature | Workbird | Make (formerly Integromat) |
|---|---|---|
AI Agents Built-in AI agents with reasoning and decision-making | Native | |
MCP Servers Model Context Protocol server integrations | 4,000+ | |
Web Scraping Built-in web scraping capabilities | 1,500+ agents | |
Visual Workflow Builder Drag-and-drop workflow designer | ||
Conditional Logic If/then logic and branching | Advanced | |
Custom Code Write custom code in workflows | Python & JS | Limited |
API Integrations Third-party app integrations | 500+ | |
Real-time Triggers Instant workflow execution | ||
Browser Extension Chrome extension for triggers | ||
Team Collaboration Shared workspaces and permissions | ||
Version Control Workflow versioning and rollback | ||
Advanced Analytics Execution logs and cost prediction | Limited |
Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing models and see which platform offers better value for your automation needs
100 credits/month • Perfect to start
10,000 credits/month • Advanced features
100,000 credits/month • Team collaboration
Unlimited credits • Custom features
Credit-Based Model
Pay only for workflow executions. 1 credit = 1 workflow transition. Fair, transparent, and predictable.
Basic modules
All operations
Priority support
Team management
Pricing Limitations
- • Operations-based pricing still expensive at scale
Better Value with Workbird
Average cost savings vs competitors
More features at same price point
Transparent, predictable pricing
Strengths & Weaknesses
Honest comparison of what each platform does well and where they fall short
Strengths
- Native AI agents with reasoning and decision-making capabilities
- 4,000+ MCP servers for unlimited extensibility and custom integrations
- 1,500+ built-in web scraping agents from Apify
- Complete ecosystem: triggers, workflows, AI, and MCP in one platform
- Fair, transparent credit-based pricing that scales with usage
- Visual workflow builder + full Python/JavaScript code support
Considerations
- Newer platform compared to legacy competitors
- Learning curve for advanced AI agent features
Strengths
- Visual workflow design
- More affordable than Zapier
- Better for complex workflows
- Good error handling
Limitations
- No AI agents or intelligent routing
- Steeper learning curve
- No built-in web scraping capabilities
- Limited MCP or custom integrations
- Operations-based pricing still expensive at scale
- No native AI model integration
Best Use Cases
When to choose each platform based on your automation needs
Choose Workbird When You Need:
Intelligent Automation
AI agents that reason, make decisions, and collaborate within workflows
Scalable Web Scraping
1,500+ pre-built web scraping agents for data extraction at any scale
Custom Integrations
4,000+ MCP servers and ability to build custom Python/Node.js integrations
Complete Automation Platform
One platform for triggers, workflows, AI agents, and integrations
Perfect for:
- • Growing businesses that need intelligent automation
- • Teams requiring AI-powered decision making
- • Companies needing web scraping at scale
- • Organizations wanting unlimited extensibility
- • Businesses seeking transparent, fair pricing
Choose Make (formerly Integromat) When You Need:
Complex multi-step workflows
Data transformation
API orchestration
Best suited for:
- • Visual workflow design
- • More affordable than Zapier
- • Better for complex workflows
Not ideal for:
- • No intelligent AI agents
- • Complex interface for beginners
- • No web scraping